Log In/Create Account  | myWRA | Advertising | Contact | Help | Employment
PRESS RELEASES 
Updated on January 11, 2008
2006 Press Releases

Housing Market Solid Despite Decline in Sales
 

Date:  November 20, 2006

For More Information Contact: David E. Clark, Economist C3 Statistical Solutions Inc.
Office phone: 414-803-6537

Madison - Home sales in Wisconsin have dropped from historic highs but still outpace the Midwest region and the nation as a whole, according to the latest analysis by the Wisconsin REALTORS® Association (WRA). The REALTORS® showed sales of existing homes in Wisconsin declining 7.5 percent in the third quarter of 2006 as compared to the third quarter of 2005 with a seasonally adjusted total of 29,425 units selling during the third quarter of this year. In contrast, the Midwest region was down 11.8 percent, and the nation was off its Q3 2005 pace by 12.7 percent.

“Our housing market remains fundamentally solid and we can expect a strong finish for 2006 and a strong beginning for 2007,” said WRA Chairman Roger Rushman. “That’s good news not only for our economy but for Wisconsin families and businesses. We have to remember we’re comparing these numbers to historically high sales volumes of the past few years.”

Rushman said the foundation of the market is both strong and sustainable. “The good news is that the statewide economy remains healthy with the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate at 4.7 percent in September, and the state has added 46,000 jobs over the last year,” said Rushman. While noting that the 30-year conventional mortgage rate was nearly a percent higher in the third quarter of 2006 as compared to the third quarter of 2005, Rushman suggested there is room for optimism on that front as well. “The Fed has stopped raising short term rates as inflationary pressures have eased, and mortgage rates have actually dropped nearly 0.5 percent since July,” said Rushman.

Third Quarter Regional Sales Data

Third quarter home sales fell from the record levels established in 2005 in all regions of the state. Specifically, existing home sales were down between 6.7 percent and 18.4 percent, with all but two regions falling by a double-digit margin. The decline in the Northeast region was 6.7 percent; in the Central region 9.6 percent; and in the West 11.6 percent. Home sales volume in the Southeast region fell 13.6 percent and home sales in the South Central region dropped 15.1 percent. Finally, the Northern region slid 18.4 percent over the period.

The smallest regional decline in sales volume was in the Northeast region, where existing home sales fell 6.7 percent in the third quarter of 2006 as compared to that same quarter in 2005. Within the region, a number of counties saw their home sales grow. Most dramatic was Menominee County, which increased 66.7 percent, although this was on very low volume. However, on more solid volume, Marinette County was up 21.9 percent, Oconto County increased 8.3 percent and Green Lake County rose 7.1 percent. Waupaca County was up 3 percent and Calumet County was essentially flat (+0.8 percent). Down modestly was Manitowoc County (-4.5 percent), followed by Brown County (-5.7 percent), Winnebago County (-6.3 percent) and Kewaunee County (-8.3 percent). Home sale reductions in Q3 2006 as compared to the levels set in Q3 2005 were more substantial in Fond du Lac County (-12.7 percent), Shawano County (-15.1 percent), Outagamie County (-16.3), and Door County (-20.2 percent).

The Central region, which has led the state in sales volume growth in the first two quarters of 2006, saw its sales fall 9.6 percent in Q3 2006 as compared to Q3 2005. The county with the strongest growth was Adams County, where sales were up 23.8 percent, although that was based on just five additional sales for the quarter. One of the larger counties in the region, Wood County, rose slightly (2.7 percent), whereas the remaining counties were substantially off their Q3 2005 pace. Portage County fell 11 percent on initial volume of 264 units, Waushara County dropped 14.3 percent from just under 100 sales in Q3 2005, and the largest county in the region, Marathon County, saw its sales volume drop 15.1 percent. The biggest slide was in Clark County, where existing home sales fell 21.9 percent, but that resulted from just seven fewer sales in Q3 2006 as compared to the same quarter in 2005.

The West region fell 11.6 percent over the third quarter 2005 to third quarter 2006 period and all but one county in the region reported a decline. St. Croix County was up slightly (+1 percent), which is notable given that this county in the Minneapolis metropolitan area has been red hot in recent years. While La Crosse County declined just 5.1 percent, the other counties were off their Q3 2005 pace by double digits. Specifically, the counties of Buffalo, Trempealeau and Pepin, which are combined for reporting purposes, dropped 11.4 percent on modest volume, whereas Eau Claire County fell 11.5 percent on more sizeable initial sales volume. Pierce County, which also borders Minneapolis, fell 14 percent on solid volume whereas two other counties experienced more substantial reductions. Chippewa County dropped 29.8 percent, whereas Dunn County slid 32.9 percent over the period.

The Southeast region dropped 13.6 percent over the period between Q3 2005 and Q3 2006 with all counties declining between 10 and 22 percent. Milwaukee County, which is the largest county in the state, dropped 10.2 percent, whereas the second largest county in the Milwaukee metro area, Waukesha County, fell 12.2 percent. Sheboygan County was down by 13.6 percent and similarly, Washington County was off its Q3 2005 pace by 13.9 percent. In the middle of the pack was Kenosha County, which dropped 15.2 percent, whereas Walworth County was down by 18.6 percent for the period. Finally, two counties experienced reductions in existing home sales in Q3 2006 that were more than 20 percent lower than the levels set in the same quarter in 2005. They were Ozaukee County, which fell 20.1 percent, and Racine County, which dropped 21.7 percent.

The South Central region saw its volume of existing homes fall 15.1 percent from Q3 2005 to Q3 2006. Within the region, all counties were down from their Q3 2005 levels, although there was considerable volatility. While both Sauk County (-0.9 percent) and Green County (-2.4 percent) changed very little, larger reductions were seen in Dodge County, which fell 6.1 percent, and Rock County, which declined 8.2 percent. Even larger reductions were found elsewhere. The most populous county in the region, Dane County, fell a substantial 18 percent; Columbia County was down 21.2 percent; and in Jefferson County, which has had very strong growth in recent years, sales dropped 26.4 percent.

Finally, the North region was down most significantly, with Q3 2006 existing home volume falling 18.4 percent as compared to the Q3 2005 levels. Over the last several quarters, there has been significant variability between counties in the region, with double-digit growth in some counties and double-digit declines in others not uncommon in the same quarter. Given the heavy concentration of second homes, this volatility is somewhat expected. While only two counties saw positive growth, the increase was substantial in Lincoln County, which rose 43.8 percent on initial volume of 64 units in Q3 2005. Forest County was up 10 percent, although this was based on just five additional units sold, whereas Taylor County was unchanged; Douglas County was down 3.1 percent; and Langlade County fell 5.6 percent, all on modest initial sales volume. The remaining reductions in unit sales volume were more significant. Barron County fell 11.5 percent; Burnett County was down 12.5 percent; Iron County declined 14.5 percent; Ashland and Bayfield counties, which are combined for reporting purposes, were down 17.5 percent; and Polk County, which borders Minneapolis, dropped 17.8 percent. Finally, numerous counties, some of which had significant volume in Q3 2005, slid 20 percent or more. Washburn County was off its Q3 2005 pace by 21.6 percent, whereas Vilas County dropped 22 percent; Oneida County fell 26.6 percent; Price County declined 29 percent; Sawyer County slid 32 percent; and Rusk County fell 37.7 percent. Finally, Florence County reported a drop in sales volume of 75 percent, however that is on initial volume of just eight units.

Third Quarter Median Housing Price Data

Median home prices for the third quarter were unchanged statewide at $166,000 as compared to their Q3 2005 values, according to the REALTORS®’ report. “It is clear that there has been some softening in the housing market with sales volume down in all regions of the state, but it is a good sign that we have maintained values over the same period,” said WRA President William Malkasian. He further noted that moderating housing price appreciation below the high levels we have seen over the past four years is a welcome change that helps to maintain affordability for those new households just entering the housing market. “Housing accounts for roughly a third of total family assets according to a recent Federal Reserve Bank study, and the rise in homeownership rates nationwide has been a boon to household wealth,” said Malkasian. He indicated that the WRA is confident that housing will remain an affordable option for Wisconsin households.

Median housing prices were up 3 percent to $160,000 in the West region in the third quarter of 2006 as compared to the third quarter of 2005. Within the region, Chippewa County experienced the strongest median price appreciation, with prices rising 9 percent to $137,500 over the period. Also up was Eau Claire County, which rose 5.6 percent to $143,300, as well as St. Croix County, which increased 2.2 percent to $213,600. Interestingly, Chippewa and Eau Claire counties experienced double-digit reductions in volume as compared to the third quarter of last year, suggesting that these price increases may have led in part to the reduction in volume. Median prices were flat in Dunn County (+0.1 percent to $145,500) and they fell by small margins in La Crosse County (-2.6 percent to $135,300) and also in Pierce County (-3.2 percent to $185,000). Finally, median prices dropped 7.1 percent to $102,200 in the combined counties of Buffalo, Trempealeau and Pepin.

The South Central region saw median prices increase 1.1 percent to $182,000 over the period Q3 2005 to Q3 2006. Within the region, all but one county experienced some median price appreciation, and it was particularly strong in three of the counties. Specifically, median prices in Jefferson County rose 8.5 percent to $177,500; they increased 7.7 percent to $163,100 in Columbia County; and they grew 6.9 percent to $144,300 in Green County. The strong price appreciation may have contributed to the double-digit reduction in sales in Columbia and Jefferson counties. In contrast, the median price growth in Rock County was 2.7 percent to $132,200 and it was 1.8 percent to $214,600 in Dane County. Finally, median prices were essentially flat in the remaining two counties that report home sales. Sauk County median prices rose just 0.1 percent to $158,300 and they fell 0.9 percent to $131,400 in Dodge County.

The median price of existing homes was up 1 percent to $126,200 in the Central region of the state when comparing the third quarter of 2006 with the third quarter of 2005. For two of the small counties in the region, the change in the median price over the period was dramatic. In Adams County, the median price rose 62.3 percent to $190,000 and it increased 27.9 percent to $110,000 in Clark County. Median prices may increase for two separate reasons. First, it may be the case that the general level of housing prices in the county has increased over the two quarters. Second, it may be that the mix of homes that sold in the most recent quarter was qualitatively better than the mix that sold in the previous year. We suspect that the majority of this median price change is due to a change in the mix of homes that sold. In Marathon County, which is the only metropolitan county in the region, the median price increased 3 percent to $138,800 and median prices were unchanged at $130,000 in Waushara County. Finally, two of the larger counties in the region experienced modest declines in their median prices from Q3 2005 to Q3 2006. Portage County saw its median prices fall 3.2 percent to $132,500 and Wood County witnessed a 5.6 percent reduction to $89,000 over the period.

Median prices were unchanged at $182,200 between Q3 2006 and that same quarter in 2005 in the Southeast region of the state. Within the region the evidence is mixed, with roughly half of the counties experiencing increases in their median prices, and the remainder either flat or experiencing modest declines. The largest rate of appreciation was in Walworth County, where median prices rose 6.4 percent to $200,000. This was followed by Ozaukee County, which saw its prices increase 3.6 percent to $247,600, and Milwaukee County, where prices grew 2.6 percent to $162,900. Three counties were relatively flat. In Racine County, the median price rose 0.9 percent to $160,000; it fell 0.5 percent to $172,500 in Kenosha County; and dropped 0.6 percent to $133,300 in Sheboygan County. Finally, moderate 2.2 percent reductions were seen in both Washington County, where prices dropped to $202,300, and Waukesha County, where prices fell to $253,100.

The most volatile region in terms of median price fluctuation over the past several years has been the North region, and the most recent quarter is no exception. While overall, median prices fell just 3.3 percent to $131,100 over the Q3 2005 to Q3 2006 period, a number of counties were up substantially, while others saw median prices fall significantly. Given that home sales consist of both first homes and vacation properties, such volatility is not surprising, especially when the mix of homes changes in a given quarter. For example, median prices in Iron County rose 60.3 percent to $110,000; they increased 47.8 percent to $170,000 in Douglas County; and they grew 32.9 percent to $93,000 in Price County. Also up by double-digits were Taylor County (+17.4 percent to $110,000), Washburn County (+14.4 percent to $212,500) and Rusk County (+13 percent to $120,000). Oneida County saw its median price increase 7.2 percent to $128,600 and prices rose 2.4 percent to $129,200 in Barron County. In contrast, several counties experienced a modest reduction in the median price between Q3 2005 and Q3 2006.

Specifically, median prices fell 2.3 percent to $170,000 in Burnett County; they dropped 4.8 percent to $160,000 in Polk County; they declined 4.9 percent to $72,000 in Langlade County; and they fell 5.1 percent to $125,000 in the combined Ashland/Bayfield counties. Higher median price reductions were found in Sawyer County (-6.4 percent to $165,000), Vilas County (-8 percent to $153,300) and Lincoln County (-10.3 percent to $102,500). Finally, the largest median price decline was seen in Forest County, where the median price slid 40.9 percent to $66,200 over the period. Again, such dramatic movements in price almost certainly reflect changes in the mix of homes that sold over the period.

Median prices fell 3.6 percent to $133,300 in the Northeast region of the state between the third quarter of 2005 and the third quarter of 2006. Most of the counties experienced very modest changes in prices although some appreciation was in the double-digits. Median prices in Kewaunee County were up 12.5 percent to $108,800, followed by Shawano County, which saw its median price rise 6.7 percent to $106,700 over the period. Numerous counties had median prices that were relatively unchanged or slightly down over the Q3 2005 to Q3 2006 period. They include Calumet County (+0.5 percent to $165,000), Door County (unchanged at $250,000), Outagamie County (unchanged at $140,000), Brown County (-1.5 percent to $151,400), Waupaca County (-1.6 percent to $110,900) and Fond du Lac County (-1.9 percent to $123,100). Slightly higher reductions were seen in Manitowoc County (-3.2 percent to $91,400) and Winnebago County (-3.8 percent to $123,100). Finally median price fell more substantially in Oconto County (-7.6 percent to $128,000), and the largest reductions were found in Green Lake County, where prices dropped 11.4 percent to $117,800, and in Marinette County, where they slid 18.7 percent to $76,400 over the period.

The Wisconsin REALTORS® Association is one of the largest trade associations in the state, representing over 17,000 real estate brokers, salespeople and affiliates statewide. Sales estimates for the state are provided by the National Association of REALTORS® which seasonally adjusts quarterly sales figures. All county figures on sales volume and median prices are compiled by the Wisconsin REALTORS® Association and are not seasonally adjusted. Median prices are only computed if the county recorded at least 10 home sales in the quarter. Finally, several counties in the Western and Northern regions were re-benchmarked by their data vendors in 2006 and thus Q2 2005 figures were also revised so as to be comparable with the most recent quarter.

Wisconsin Housing Statistics Online
 

Printable Copy of this Press Release

Q3 comparison from 2005 and 2006 Spreadsheet

Back to Top
Add this page to myWRA Favorites

Home | Education | Products & Services | Public Affairs | Legal Services | REALTOR® Resources | Find A REALTOR®
Consumer Resources | Become a REALTOR® | Contact Us | Help | myWRA

Copyright 1998 - 2008 Wisconsin REALTORS® Association. All rights reserved.
    Privacy Policy | Terms of Use